Politically speaking, socio-economic activities usually increase with population growth thus making it imperative for those responsible with delivering specific services to expand their infrastructure so as to meet new demands.
This
informed the practice of installing relief transformers by the defunct National
Electric Power Authority (NEPA) in areas where they are needed and is done
after several load reading exercises have shown locations that require such infrastructural
upgrades.
When
an existing transformer is overloaded, and in order to protect it from damage,
the interim measure often carried out is to embark on load rationing by drawing
up a load shedding timetable in affected areas/community. This normally result
into some areas enjoying power supply during the day while others are given
supply at night and this method is often rotated to safeguard the already
overloaded transformer.
To
relieve the customers from such inconvenience, the normal practice is to either
uprate existing transformers or add a new one in order to increase available
capacity. For instance, an existing 200kVA 11/.415kV transformer can be
replaced with a new 500kVA 11/.415kV transformer or another 200kVA 11/.415kV
transformer installed to complement the existing one.
This
practice calls for heavy investment in procuring transformers of different
ratings and other associated equipment like circuit breakers, conductors,
insulators, isolators, relays etc., which often comes from money collected from
the customers.
Since
the unbundling of the power sector under the Electricity Sector Reforms Act
(ESRA) of 2005, this enviable practice has receded as the distribution
companies (DISCOs) seem to have shirked this responsibility and left it to be
done by the customers of electricity.
Although
it can be argued that the market is not delivering expected revenue for
services rendered, it is illegal to transfer the burden of infrastructural
expansion to helpless customers who are “tricked” into buying relief
transformers and thereafter transferring ownership of the procured transformers
to the DISCOs by making such commitments in writing.
The
main reason for the privatization of the power sector is to inject efficiency
into the sector by attracting funds for investment with the aim of improving
the sector for better service delivery.
To
this end, the DISCOs should re-introduce the concept of relief transformers
into the sector for better service delivery.
With
such step taken by them, the capacity of their network will increase and electricity
will be more available for the use of Nigerians for both domestic and
industrial purposes, and by extension this will translate into more revenue for
the market.
To be
very effective, it is pertinent for Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission
(NERC) (the regulatory authority) to establish a monitoring team to take
inventory of areas experiencing epileptic power supply due to overloaded
transformers and follow-up the action of the DISCOs to resolve such issues
through the installation of relief transformers across their franchise.
0 Comments